Tuesday, September 11, 2007

Mitch Interviews Richard Shepard...


...director of such films as The Matador, starring Pierce Brosnan and the upcoming The Hunting Party, starring Richard Gere and Terrence Howard. This is the unedited version so it may take you a while to read. I take credit for all errors, lol.

Make sure you come back Friday for the review of The Hunting Party, an entertaining yet informative look at three journalists who go after a Bosnian war criminal.

This was a round table sort of thing with me, another journalist named Jason Buchanan, staff writer for All Movie Guide (www.allmovieguide.com) and Richard Shephard to promot The Hunting Party, a film starring Richard Gere and Terence Howard. There really wasn't a “start” to the interview, we just started chatting and the first thing that came up was that me and Jason had crammed as many of Mr. Shepards movies as we could over the weekend. That led into a discussion about director's commentaries, so I shall start with Mr. Shepards take on commentaries.


RS: Yea, you look into my director commentary babble. I love that when on a DVD directors talk, but a lot of the time it's not that interesting because they are sort of repeating what you have already seen. They're like, this is the scene where they walk out of the house and down the street. William Friedkin is one of my favorite directors and his commentaries are awful because they are exactly that. You want stories and behind the scenes, you know? Coppalas commentaries are really great. Sometimes the story behind it is more interesting than the movie. At the end of the day I made this thriller, Mexico City in Mexico City and I had such a great time just making the movie and I'm like, this movie kind of paints Mexico as this horrifying place but i actually had a really good time, I actually want to make another movie set in Mexico City that actually shows the positive side which is why I set The Matador there.


Jason: I was wondering about that when I watched The Matador, it seemed like you really wanted to go back.


RS: I didn't choose to write this (The Hunting Party) to go to Bosnia though.


J: That was the next question, did you have a similar experience there?


RS, I did. Listen, Mexico is a particular culture. They are incredibly warm people. The sun, the tequila and everything, it's just a really nice place to make a movie. Bosnia, the people are very nice, but it's a war torn country and it's a different vibe so we had a really interesting time making the movie but it wasn't the same. It wasn't Margarita time, you know? And since we were shooting in places where the war had really happened and a lot of our crew had lived through the war. The Bosnians have a pretty dark sense of humor and a good sense of humor, but it's a different sort of experience.


Me: Did you have any trouble with any crew that lived through that having flashbacks or anything?


RS: A few people had to leave the set. There's a scene that actually got cut out where Richard Gere is in the bathtub and he has a flashback of them (Gere and Howard) running with a camera that was part of a sequence in Sniper Alley which was an area where people were constantly shot at from up in the hills. It was shot at Sniper's Alley in Sarajevo and several crew members had to leave because it was too much. The set was exactly what it was like, the burnt out cars, people getting shot. That was really grounding for us to know that people were having that reaction. It made me feel terrible for them but at the same time we must have been doing something right. One of the reasons I wanted to shoot it there was that I figured the crew would keep us honest. They see the comedy in the United Nations ridiculous effort to try and catch these war criminals and as soon as they realized that we weren't making fun of what happened in the war they were fine with what we were doing and I think they were happy that we chose to shoot it there. We could have shot the movie in Bulgaria and saved ourselves three million dollars and had another ten days to make the movie, but I am convinced it wouldn't have been as good.


J: I noticed in Mexico City, you used a lot of local talent, did you do the same for The Hunting Party?


RS: Yes, it's great. The guy who played The Fox in The Hunting Party is a Sit-Com actor in Croatia. That would be like taking Jason Alexander, George from Seinfeld, and making him a bad guy. No one knows this guy here (The Fox), so in a way, you have this wide range of talent and they are completely fresh faces here to America and I think it is so great when you see an actor you don't know. I also think it's fun to see actors you know doing something different than what we are used to seeing. I think that's part of what is great about casting Gere and Howard in those roles, it's not everyday you see them play roles like that, but to see an unknown guy doing something, yea, he's a great actor, he just happens to live in Croatia and not in LA and that's the reason you don't know him. I think that also the local faces, the extras are so great, they don't look like actors. You could shoot the woods of Bosnia in Vancouver, you really could, and half the time we were there we were like, why aren't we in Vancouver, but at the same time, you'd never get those extras, you'd never get that real feeling of being there.


JB: You used the term “mood-tage” on one of your commentaries.


RS: Without a doubt. It's a real shorthand, like when Gere, Howard, and Eisenberg walk into that bar with the animal heads on the wall and the people there all turn and look? Those people were real townspeople in that little town that we shot in. Just their faces said so much more than any dialogue, you just knew that that was how they lived. People who work outside have that sort of face and you can't fake it and I'm always wondering, how can you tell shorthand a bigger story? Like when they walk away from that “Enjoy Sarajevo” thing and you think they are sitting in front of a Coca-Cola sign. We recreated it but it was a real piece of art in Sarajevo at the time. To me, that just says an enormous amount, there's this mortar wound in this thing and it says enjoy Sarajevo and it's just wow, what the hell does that mean?


ME: That leads to another question. You said last night (at the Q&A after the screening) that you made this first and foremost to be entertainment. How hard was it to walk the line between showing too much war and not showing enough. How much did you feel you could put in there before it changed the tone of the film?


RS: Well, if it's the issue, if I was just making a movie about the hunt for some criminal set in Vegas, then it's just a caper or an invention movie, but this is A. a true story, and B. about a serious situation. There is nothing funny about war crimes, but, there is something humorous about what was going on then and what happened to these real journalists. When we were cutting the movie we tested it a lot. We screened it for a lot of audiences. You guys are some of the first to see the finished movie, but we test screened it a lot and if it was too silly, they don't take the drama seriously and if it's too dramatic they won't laugh for twenty minutes. So how do we balance that? I think we achieved it but it was tricky and not so easy and that's why I think ultimately you don't see a lot of movies that try to mix genres because they are hard in the sense that if the comedy works, it works, it's funny. Knocked Up is funny. If it's not funny, it doesn't work. If The Bourne Ultimatum isn't thrilling, it doesn't work. Here is a situation where it's not so simple, it has to be two things and two things are harder than one thing. I think that's why these actors wanted to do it in the first place, it seemed a little different.


ME: That's what interested me. I looked it up (The Hunting Party) on IMDB and I noticed all the genres it was listed under, action, adventure, drama, comedy and thriller. It's a very well rounded movie and you can't go wrong with that.


JB: You made the point last night that life has all of that. Life has laughs, life has horror, life has everything.


RS: Especially in this story, in this real thing. It was especially weird shooting that first battle scene where you meet Richard Gere and he's asking for a Quaalude. We filmed that where a real battle had taken place and that burnt out building was not art directed. We added the explosions, but the set was a real street.


JB: You said they did their own stunts, Gere and Howard?


RS: Yes, they did it all. Even that night where they are kidnapped and being shoved down the hill and Jesse slo-mo's, he really did that. The big thing was when they were hung up. That took three days to shoot, with tape on their mouths and let me tell you something, if those guys were assholes, we would never have gotten through it. Thankfully they were really nice. When you start tying people up, it really hurts, even though you aren't really tying them up, just being like this (demonstrates). We didn't have the money for real sets so it was really a barn in the middle of nowhere, really at night. It was cold and wet.


ME: It makes it more real.


JB: I can see where they would lose themselves in it a little more.


RS: It was fun, I like working that way.


ME: It's fun to tie up Richard Gere?


RS: (laughs)You know what, sometimes when the actors are pissing you off, I know we aren't shooting for another ten minutes but go ahead and tape their mouths and leave them up there anyways.


ME: You said we were some of the first people to see it, are you prepared to be answering those hard questions about leaving out thing like Russia's involvement in the war and other questions like that?


( This is in reference to a question brought up at the Q&A about why he left some facts out)


RS: At the end of the day, if you aren't in tune with someone politically, they are going to have trouble with whatever you are doing. There's a theory that this guy Radovan Karadicz, the real guy, is being hidden by Russians. Now that's a theory among many others. Could I have had a line in the movie about it? Probably, but to answer your question, I am prepared most of the time to talk about the political things. Listen, I was interviewed today by a conservative web person who was basically on me about the fact that I was siding with the Muslims. It's not fiction that genocide happened here, it's not like I'm making something up that makes the Muslims seem sympathetic. I say in the movie that atrocities happened on all sides and in real life there are war criminals from every side of the war but the fact is the Muslims got their ass kicked in that war and it's horrible. They got slaughtered and raped and I would be making a fake movie if I didn't show that and deal with that, so that's a political thing. If the movie gains any traction and people start to see it and like it, it will gain in some way but I'm up for it. I know the subject, it's not like they're asking me about some subject that I know too much about. I was killing time before an interview at Borders and I was looking at the Bosnian War books and I was like, “I'm done with this movie, what the fuck am I doing here?”, I've read every single one of these things.


JB: You said you read a lot of them. What would you recommend if people wanted to find out more about this war?


RS: There's this great book and I'm trying to remember the name of the author (Anthony Loyd) called My War Gone By, I Miss It So. Track it down at Amazon, I think you guys would love it. He was a junkie who basically shows up in Bosnia without any newspaper behind him who somehow gets a job as a stringer (freelance) reporter and it changes his life. Whenever he's not in Bosnia he's back on junk because he's an adrenaline junkie as well as a junkie junkie. He's such a great writer, he's so funny and so vivid. Reading that book, it was like, man, these guys have a great sense of humor and yet they look at things in a way that we can't. That's how they survive. He describes things in that book that just curdle you, just horrible stuff that if you and I were to see it, one day would just devastate us, but if you see it everyday, who do you deal with that? You have to find a sense of humor about it.


JB: Like in the scene where Richard Gere finds his girlfriend, that was just powerful.


ME: I like how you showed what happened and then why it happened.


RS: I did that on purpose. I think movies, a lot of the time, tell you everything you need to know in the first three minutes about a character. I love movies where you kind of peel back the onion, where it’s kind of like well, we think we know Richard Gere, but actually you don’t.


ME: You don’t realize it’s personal


RS: Right. And you think you get him, like Jesse Eisenburg just thinks he’s a jerk, and then he hears that and it’s like whoah, well maybe there’s more to this guy now, there’s more to him, and I think that that’s interesting. I did it in The Matador too in that you think you know what Pierce is but at the end of the day he’s totally different than you expect. And the baggage that Pierce brought as an actor to the thing that you know him as James Bond, you’ll be hooked with what you think you know about him, but by the time he’s pathetically crying and asking Greg to help him it’s like wow, that is not the guy I thought he was when he walked in the movie. And I think that’s fun. And the more you can keep an audience not knowing what’s going to happen both story and character wise then you actually can build tension in a way that doesn’t have to rely on special effects or anything like that. It causes a tension because you just don’t know. Like I hope that the scene where they’re hung up in the barn that it causes people to think someone might actually bite it.


ME: I have to ask you about Dylan Baker, because he’s in The Matador, Oxygen, and The Hunting Party. I’ve also seen him in the Spiderman movies, where he’s a lighter character. Are you friends with him?


RS: I’m friends with him in the sense that every two years we meet up for like a day and he does a cameo in a movie of mine. I do think he’s such a good actor and I wrote that part in The Hunting Party for him because I had him in Oxygen and he had this one big monologue and he was so great I’m like this guy’s amazing. That was not an easy monologue and he just like killed it in two takes. And so then in The Matador I’m like who could play this part, and then I thought let’s track Dylan Baker down, see if he’ll come down to Mexico. And then on this one it was easy because now we’ve worked together before. He’s a great character actor, and I think that’s one of the reasons Terrance Howard is so good, because he started out as a character actor, and when you start off as a character actor you have to hit a home run in every scene, cuz sometimes it’s only one scene. So if you want to make an impression on a filmgoer you have to really be good. It’s not about being OK. And Dylan Baker’s career is about coming in and being really good in whatever role, like in Spider man, which I think he’s really good in those movies, or Happiness it’s a completely different kind of role he played in that. And I think Terrance also comes from that school where he is a professional scene stealer, he always has been. And I think that’s why I wanted to mix him up with Gere because Gere had to stay on his toes or Howard was going to just steal the movie because he’s that type of actor.


JB: I like the character details. I got a lot of, sort of, what Pierce Brosnan had done in The Matador, Richard Gere was kind of doing here. Like you said, he kind of reinvented himself. I didn’t see a lot of this Richard Gere before.


RS: That’s right. I think that’s kind of like how it’s smart to cast a movie where you don’t have a lot of money. Because if you have a ton of money you can get almost any actor to do anything. If someone is going through a divorce and needs 15 million dollars then you can get them. But if you don’t have 15 million, if that’s the whole budget of your movie, you’ve got to figure out how am I going to get an actor to actually do this part. To me it’s like take an actor who is likely jonesing to do something different, that they’re not the sort of roles they’re always offered. Pierce is so likeable as an actor , you just like him, whatever the history is of him you kinda like him, and that’s where I thought he’d be great in The Matador. Why it worked in The Matador is because you like him so you can accept him being a scoundrel. And I think the same thing with Gere. You like him so much you can kind of accept him stealing money from a (can’t understand) doing things that with other characters you might be like what a dick. So with Gere you kind of give him a little bit cuz he smiles at you and you kinda gotta go with it. It’s a very subliminal thing. Terrance has done plenty of these sort of darker characters is Crash and Hustle and Flow. I mean he’s great in those movies but dark. I think he was like “Oh man, I get to smile, I get to play guitar, I get to fuck around.” That’s why he wanted to do it. So you kind of mix and match and you hope. The Matador first and then this is sort of more buddy movie that doesn’t feel like just a normal buddy movie. The idea that men can love each other in some deep heterosexual way, that they can hang out and talk with each other in a sort of sarcastic way, that’s kind of one of the elements I’ve been trying to deal with. When I hang out with my friends it’s a lot of insults, you make fun of each other, and I like that, and I think it’s not every day that you see that. When you see a buddy movie it tends to be like I Now Pronounce You Chuck and Larry or whatever, which is so very specifically like “He’s the blah blah and he’s the blah and together they’re…” I think that you can mix it up a little bit. When people starting looking at The Matador as a buddy movie I was like yeah, it is, and you should enjoy it as you do a good buddy movie like The Inlaws or something like that, but at the same time there’s hopefully more to it.


JB: I had a question about the scene in The Matador where you have Pierce Brosnan walking through the hotel lobby in the boots….you guys said you dreamt that up in a couple days. Was there anything like that in The Hunting Party?


RS: That’s funny you should ask that. Not really. Though I’ll tell you, there’s a bit of a long story that’s interesting about Terrance and Richard as actors. In the scene where they’re hung up there’s a guy with a tattoo on his head. In the scene itself The Fox never talks to Richard Gere, he just watches. But in the scene in the movie The Fox comes out from the shadows and has a confrontation with Gere. So we started rehearsing the scene the way it was originally written, with The Fox just watching, and the actor with the tattoo on his head was great when he was speaking in Serbian, but his English wasn’t so great, and he was kind of over acting. You couldn’t tell he was over acting when he was acting in Serbian, but when he was speaking English he wasn’t the greatest actor. Something about the scene’s not going right, we would rehearse it, da-da-da…Terrance Howard comes over to me and he’s like “We’re fucking up right now. That actor who’s playing The Fox is so god damned good, and he’s the one who has this thing with Richard Gere, and he’s the one who should be talking to Richard Gere, not this guy.” It’s OK in the beginning, but when it’s finally about confrontation with Gere talking it should be The Fox. And if you’re sitting there, you’ve already rehearsed for two hours, you’re already two hours behind, and you think about what it’s going to take to make that change, and all the ramifications of it…you gotta cut some lines out of that scene at the end where they confront him in the woods, cuz the scene begins and he’s talking in Bosnian because he doesn’t know that they’re American, because we had shot it first. Terrance detected something that was not in the script, that was a major change, and as a film maker if you don’t listen to that you’re just screwed. I could have just been like “This is the way we’re doing it.” I’d rather deal with the repercussions of going over schedule if it’s to make the scene so much better, which it did. That scene’s a great scene, it’s the best part of Richard Gere’s entire performance in my mind, when he’s sort of begging for his life, and all the lives, he's told people the whole movie he'd come back and pay him back in spades, the fact that he’s saying it to that guy, the guy who killed his girlfriend along with millions of other people, that made that scene really good. And it was basically Terrance, and if Terrance hadn’t voiced what he was thinking it wouldn’t have been as good, and I also think the whole movie wouldn’t have been as good. There should be a fluidity when you’re making a movie, that’s part of what the process is like. I mean on The Matador it was high comedy, I mean I like to think the movie’s realistic, and even that scene’s realistic, but it’s clearly a visual thing. That was like fuck it, this is gonna be funny, we had the freedom to try it, and believe me if it wasn’t funny it wouldn’t have ended up in the movie. But I’m a fan of, if someone brings up an idea that’s good you should at least think about it, I mean you’re stupid if you don’t. And also as the director you always get the credit even if it’s not your idea so you may as well listen to every idea.


ME: I noticed watching Oxygen that you have The Toxic Avenger in there. Was that on purpose in the background in the scene where he’s in the bathtub?


RS: Very interesting, nice work. Toxic Avenger, we got it from Troma, yes. I had an intern trip for a day at Troma. I met Mike Kaufman, he described to me what was expected of me as an intern, including cleaning his personal toilet, and I just quit after less than a day. I loved Troma movies growing up, and so I really wanted to work there. I probably would have learned something if I would have stayed, but I was just like, you know when on the first day the guy fucking has me cleaning his toilet I’m like, no fucking way. But they were nice enough to loan us the Toxic Avenger.


ME: Not even just The Toxic Avenger, you’ve got that one scene in there so you can hear it and you just know it.


RS: Like I put Missing In Action in there


ME: Yeah, that was obvious


RS: But that’s the music (I think that’s what he says), I don’t know, there’s certain movies that just…..Like, Missing In Action is the movie that this could have been if it was just shitty. Although Chuck Norris is very nice.


JB: I know you worked with the same crew for a lot of your earlier movies, the same DP and stuff, but you’ve got David Tattersall in The Matador and here (in The Hunting Party)…how’s that?


RS: It’s amazing. The woman who shot Mexico City and Oxygen is brilliant, and I want to work with her again as soon as possible, she’s a really good DP. On The Matador Pierce said to me “I don’t care who you hire as a DP as long as they’re as good as David Tattersall.” I ended up getting David, and David was so much more experienced than I was, on every level. He had just shot the Star Wars movies, and it was funny because was doing my first green screen ever on The Matador and it was the simplest thing, and David had to really explain it to me, while he meanwhile had just gone and shot a whole fucking movie in green screen. He’d worked with such experienced directors that he just expected me to be as good as I could be. I’ll say “Why don’t we do this” and just the look on his face is like “That’s not good enough” and you’re like “OK, then why don’t we do this.” He just a motivator, he’s worked with really good people and I think he enjoys doing my movies because they’re so different from these gigantic mega 300 million dollar movies, and my movies are so not that, they’re just such different things that I think he likes wearing both hats. He said to me “We should do The Hunting Party, we should do most of it hand held, let’s just go for it, let’s not be dealing with all the normal things that you do with a movie.” Most movies there’s a mark on the ground where the actor has to stand, so he walks across the room and has to land on this mark, and actors are great at actually looking down at their mark without looking. But they have to hit it because this light goes like this, and the other light like this….it’s just this fucking perfect thing. So David’s just like “Fuck it, we’re just not going to give them any marks, if they stand in the wrong place I’ll move.” That was great for them and fun for us because every day was just an adventure.


ME: Well then you can also open it up and not be stuck with “OK, well we’ve got to be set up to do this.”


RS: Exactly, and you can change things. Certain things were very planned, like the wide shot with the “Enjoy Sarajevo” was a very planned, like we have to get this wide shot at the end. So certain things were very planned, and then certain things were just like let’s give them the freedom and see what they do. To me one of the best parts about making a movie are the people you collaborate with. It just is awesome, because they just bring so much and they’re working full time at only one job to do the best that they can. A production designer will bring in hundreds of ideas that you never even thought of, and the costume designer, and the editor will be only focusing on that and really finding the little moments that work. That is pretty god damned cool. You’re writing the movie and then you’re directing it, but you have all these other people who are trying to get you to do the best work that you can. At the end of the day it’s always my decision and so I have to take credit for whatever works or doesn’t work in a movie, but that doesn’t mean that everyone else doesn’t contribute. It got through on The Matador when Pierce is there in his cheerleader outfit, that was something we came up with that morning. And I had such confidence in everyone on the crew I said to the first assistant director “Can you get a trampoline, can you get such-and-such” and he’s like “yes,” I went to the costume designer and I’m like “Can you make a cheerleader outfit for Pierce by two o’clock,” and she’s like “yes.” It was like BAM BAM BAM. So then all I had to do was sheepishly knock on the door of Pierce’s trailer and say “Hey, do you have any interest in dressing up like a cheerleader” and he just starts cracking up.


That's about all there was to it. I really need to get a better recorder for the next one.

Mitch E.

mitchemerson@hotmail.com

Monday, September 10, 2007

DVD Review: The Maltese Falcon by JR

Director: John Huston
Starring: Humphrey Boart, Mary Astor, Peter Lorre, Syndney Greenstreet
Release Date: October 18, 1941


Humphrey Bogart as Sam Spade: that hat, that jacket, that face. Possibly one of the most recognizable characters in cinematic history. Hell, even I could have recognized him, probably even as young as high school. The Maltese Falcon is just one of those classic movies that everyone’s heard of, everyone’s seen stills from, and everyone knows the classic lines.


The Maltese Falcon is a classic detective story, and is based on a book by the same name. It's the film that has been recognized as the first film in the "film noir" genre. Sam Spade (Bogart) is a detective who runs a private investigative firm with his partner Miles Archer. A beautiful woman, Ruth Wonderly (played by Mary Astor) enlists the agency to help her find her missing sister and tail the man that she's run off with, and Archer gladly volunteers. While Archer is out following this man, he's shot and killed. After the murder, Sam Spade finds himself in a tailspin of greed, murder, and betrayal. I couldn't possibly outline the entire plot here, but the complexity is astounding. It's confusing, and it pushes the limits at all times. There is a murder that takes place in the first 10 minutes of the movie. There is so much sexual innuendo going on between the characters, I couldn't believe my eyes. Also, one of the characters, Mr. Cairo, was written to be very homosexual and the character was incredibly controversial in its day. This is one of the movies that they're talking about when they say, "They just don't make 'em like they used to".


The performances are phenomenal. It's what you'd expect with Humphrey Bogart as the main character, right? And we're not disappointed. This is the role that made him famous, and rightly so. He takes on the role with ease. He IS Sam Spade. The rest of the cast is perfect as well. Peter Lorre as Joe Cairo, who you may know from Casablanca and Arsenic and Old Lace, and Sydney Greenstreet as Kaspar Gutman must be mentioned for their performances. They were both just plain fun to watch. Their characters had the most entertaining idiosyncrasies: Peter Lorre with his effeminacy, and Syndy Greenstreet with his sheer size. If you've never seen The Maltese Falcon, this might help with a visual: the Marvel comics' villain Kingpin was modeled after him.

God, writing about this movie makes me want to watch it again. I'm sure there are tons of things that I missed during my viewing, that's just how this film is. It eats away at you after you've finished watching it, invading your thoughts. You sure said it Bogie: "This is the stuff dreams are made of."

5 out of 5 stars
Jenny Rushing
beccajane67@yahoo.com

Indiana Jones and the....


New Indiana Jones Adventure to be Titled
Indiana Jones and the

Kingdom of the Crystal Skull

HOLLYWOOD , Calif. (Sept. 10, 2007) – The title of the new Indiana Jones adventure, now in production under the direction of Steven Spielberg, is Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, it was revealed today by actor Shia LaBeouf.


LaBeouf, who stars in Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull with Harrison Ford, Cate Blanchett, Karen Allen, Ray Winstone and John Hurt, announced the title during today’s MTV Video Music Awards, which were broadcast live from Las Vegas .


Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull is a Lucasfilm Ltd. and is being distributed by Paramount Pictures. It will be released in the U.S. and simultaneously in most territories worldwide on Thursday, May 22, 2008. Frank Marshall returns as producer, with Kathleen Kennedy joining George Lucas as executive producer.


Breaking news about Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull can be found at http://www.indianajones.com.

Friday, September 7, 2007

Movie Review: Shoot 'Em Up by ME

Title: Shoot 'Em Up
Starring: Clive Owen, Paul Giamatti, Monica Bellucci, Greg Bryk, Jane McLean
Directed By: Michael Davis
Produced By: Michael Davis, Douglas Curtis, Don Murphy
Genre: Action/Adventure and Thriller
Release Date: September 7th 2007 (wide)
MPAA Rating: R for pervasive strong bloody violence, sexuality and some language.
Distributors: New Line Cinema

A gritty, fast-paced action thriller, Shoot 'Em Up kicks into high gear with a memorable opening scene and never relents. Clive Owen stars as Mr. Smith, a mysterious loner who teams up with an unlikely ally (Monica Bellucci) to protect a newborn baby from a determined criminal (Paul Giamatti) who hunts them throughout the bowels of the city. -Official Site

First question – Were you disappointed in Smokin' Aces? Second question – Did you like Crank? If you answered yes to both questions, then Shoot 'Em Up is the movie for you. Filled to the brim with an unbelievable amount of action and bad one liners, Shoot 'Em Up takes the best elements of both and combines them in a way that should be the template for all mindless action flicks from here on out. Michael Davis has created an almost perfect action movie. So perfect, in fact, that when screened without a lot of the bad one liners, audiences took the film too seriously. So the one liners were put back in just to lighten the movie, even if it is with groans instead of laughs.

Clive Owen does a superb job as the right guy at the wrong place and time. He has a hardness that works well in films like Sin City and Shoot 'Em Up while still showing a (slightly) softer side as in Children Of Men. He combines both along with an ingenuity as well as a dash of humor in his portrayal of “Mr. Smith”. This is the guy you want as a babysitter, but only if there is a squad of hitmen led by Paul Giamatti after you. Mr. Giamatti should come off as ridiculous in a role like this. I mean, he's Pig Vomit from Private Parts, but the man is one evil heartless son of a bitch and quashes any doubts within his first few minutes of screen time. Rounding out the cast is Monica Bellucci, who may be most recognizable as Persephone in the second and third Matrix sequels. Here she plays a lactating hooker Mr. Smith convinces to help him take care of the newborn while he goes and wreaks havoc amongst Giamatti's men. I'm not really sure what she really brings to the table here beyond being a giant milk bottle, but she doesn't detract from the overall effect.

Shoot 'Em Up is by far the most fun, if not the best action film of the year and I recommend it to action fans who just want to see some kick ass action with minimal character development, honestly. The action starts within the first two minutes! Extremely over the top, cliché, and with a chip on its shoulder the size of a log, Shoot 'Em Up delivers the action with tongue in cheek and fingers on the triggers.

Until next time,
keep reading

Mitch E.
mitchemerson@hotmail.com

Wednesday, September 5, 2007

Movie Review: Halloween by ME


Title: Halloween
Starring: Daeg Faerch, Danielle Harris, Malcolm McDowell, Danny Trejo, Sheri Moon
Directed By: Rob Zombie
Produced By: John Carpenter, Harvey Weinstein, Bob Weinstein
Genre: Suspense/Horror, Remake and Sequel
Release Date: August 31st 2007 (wide)
MPAA Rating: R for strong brutal bloody violence and terror throughout, sexual content, graphic nudity and language.
Distributors: MGM Distribution Company


Ten year-old Michael Myers has a bad childhood and kills his family. Fifteen years later, he escapes from the mental institution where he has been held and goes on a killing spree. If you don't know the plot, where have you been since 1978?

Many people feel that remakes are unnecessary. Especially a classic horror film like Halloween. But, if it's going to be done, who better than horror aficionado, musician and director Rob Zombie? Probably best known as ex-frontman of the band White Zombie as well as a solo career, Rob Zombie came onto the movie scene with House of 1000 Corpses and the follow up The Devil's Rejects. With Halloween he hones his directorial skills by taking the best elements of 70's, 80's and todays horror films and combining them in a way that pays homage without ruining a classic, I hope. I say I hope because I may be one of the few people who has never seen the original Halloween (gasp!). Yes it's true, I was more into Freddy and Jason as a teen. Is this a bad thing? Depends on how you look at it. Sometimes a fresh perspective is needed instead of a comparison between new and old.

As imposing a figure that Tyler Mane is, I don't think it was quite necessary to have such a large man play Michael Myers, especially when you have such a small kid playing him at ten years old. Speaking of the boy, Daeg Faerch, is one creepy little kid. You kinda feel sorry for him until he turns psychopathic. I found myself thinking that making the movie had to be at least a little traumatizing for the boy with some of the things he had to do. Malcolm McDowell is by far the best actor in the film. You actually get to see some of the effort that Loomis expended on trying to rehabilitate Michael. There are quite a few cameos including Zombie's usual suspects Sherri Moon Zombie, Bill Moseley and Sid Haig. There are quite a few horror icons as well though. Some of who are Udo Kier, Clint Howard, Dee Wallace and many more. Hell, even Mickey Dolenz of The Monkees puts in an appearance. I saved Scout Taylor-Compton for last because of a split decision. On one hand she is a good actress and plays the part well, when she is acting with adults or dealing with Michael. It's when she has to interact with the other teens or the children that things seem forced. The scenes of the three friends seemed almost like a caricature or stereotype of how teens act. I am not sure if it is her fault or the other actresses, but there you go.

As a non-Halloween fan, I can honestly say that I enjoyed most of Rob Zombie's vision. Some bad/overacting on the teenagers part was the only thing that got to me. So, this is one you will either love it or leave it no matter what any reviewer/critic says due to the fact that the original Halloween is a much loved classic.

I can't believe I didn't mention the soundtrack! All I can say is that Rob Zombie is a master at picking perfect songs for his films. The Devil's Rejects and Halloween have got to have the best classic rock soundtracks that have been released in a while.

Till we finally get Freddy VS. Jason VS. Ash VS. Michael Myers VS. Barney,
keep reading

Mitch E.
mitchemerson@hotmail.com

Tuesday, September 4, 2007

Movie Review: Death Sentence by JW

Title: Death Sentence

Starring: Kevin Bacon, Kelly Preston, Aisha Tyler, John Goodman
Director: James Wan
Producer: Ashok Amritraj, Howard Baldwin, Karen Elise Baldwin
Genre: Revenge
Release Date: August 31, 2007
MPAA Rating: R for strong bloody brutal violence and pervasive language
Distributors: Fox Atomic

First - a couple of points. One, Kevin Bacon is an obscenely underrated actor. The fact that he was passed over for major awards for his work in Mystic River and Murder in the First is nothing short of criminal. Two, I am on the opposite side of that spectrum when discussing director James Wan. I am just not a fan. Dead Silence was boring and I thought Saw was absolutely awful. You think it is merely coincidence that the Saw films got better after he stopped directing them? I don’t. Also, I like a good revenge movie. Be it your westerns, your Asian, or your miscellaneous revenge flicks, they are pretty good when they’re done right. But good or bad, there isn’t much in the way of originality to the basic premise. Somebody wronged somebody else and they retaliate by seeking some sort of violent retribution. Everyone has pondered that “what would you do if…” question, so there is a touch of realism that can be felt in these types of movies.

In Death Sentence, Nick Hume (Kevin Bacon) is a risk assessment executive and consummate family man. This guy has it all. The perfect family, the perfect job, and I’ll bet there is a cupboard full of ‘#1 Dad’ coffee mugs to further validate the point. The film opens with various home videos of the Hume family showing us, in numbing detail, just how tight knit this family is. The oldest son plays hockey, the youngest son paints, but they live in their own little fairy tale world where nothing seems to go wrong and everyone gets along without incident. Sure, as the movie moves forward we see that the teenage brothers *gasp* fight like, well, teenage brothers. Beyond that, all is well in the home of Hume. Of course in a revenge movie, so by standard conventions we know this wont last. Nick and oldest son Brendan (Stuart Lafferty) are returning home from a trip in the city where Brendan played hockey. The gas light comes on in the car (in the wrong part of town obviously) and they just have to stop for gas - right now! - in the most dilapitated of gas stations. I wonder if something bad will happen? Sure enough, Brendan goes in for a drink and ends up dying by way of some gang member initiation. After a brief tussle with the one who killed him, Nick gets a look at the face of the killer. At pre-trial, he decides that he will take matters into his own hands rather than put his trust in a justice system that will no doubt fail him, by killing the man who shot his Pa… I mean son. This sets off a war between his associated gang.

The story itself isn’t the problem - pretty much a by the book revenge flick - it’s everything else that feels off. Kevin Bacon deserves better. I don’t know what compelled him to make this movie. Actually, yes I do; this guy has made a career out of playing characters who are against the grain. He doesn’t fit a common mold and will never really be in danger of being type casted towards a specific character type. This could have been another in a long line of great performances, but alas… As the fairy tale father, he played the everyman with ease. But the rest of the movie felt inconsistent because it didn’t seem like he could decide how to play it. Straight bad ass, conflicted killer, scared father; his performance just jumped around too much. And his was the best performance in the movie. Gang leader Billy (Garrett Hedlund) plays the same cookie-cutter, bald headed, tatooed, wannabe BA that could have came from any other movie or street corner. He did much better on the other side of the coin in Four Brothers. The rest of the gang was equally tired and clichéd. They smoke, they drink, they cuss, and they were just too cartoony for their own good. Let me guess, their headquarters is in, oh yep, there it is - the back of a bar. How quaint. Other than a few curse laden epitaphs, they aren’t imposing or scary in the least. There must’ve been a Rollback sale on faceless, dill hole gangsters at Wal-Mart. If so, they got their moneys worth. And don’t even get me started on Aisha Tyler, as Detective Wallis. She is the most distracting, annoying, ill casted piece of trash to grace the screen in a long time. In a scene where Wallis and Hume’s wife Helen (Kelly Preston) come to the realization of what he has done, he is met with a “You are a good father” response from the wife, and a “Stay in the house. You’re lucky to be alive” from Wallis. Poor script to be sure, but her delivery in this scene and many others felt so out of place, I don’t even think she knew what movie she was ‘acting’ in. If you can even call it that. On her best day of shooting, she wasn’t half as good as Cary Elwes on his worst day shooting Saw.

Much like the acting, the direction was inconsistent. There were parts that caught my interest, but the movie never really found its groove. It wanted to be a gritty revenge movie. Then it wanted to have heart. Then it went back. And forth. And so on. Director James Wan went to such lengths to humanize the family in the beginning that it became overbearing, and in the end, I just didn’t care. He used filters to make the film look washed out and gritty, then he hit us with an overuse of color. Mostly red. And a lot of it. The violence was brutal and bloody, but came in spurts (no pun intended). It was graphic, then it was restrained. Almost like Wan picked his spots where to show his ability to direct violence, then let someone else fill in the rest. The best part of the movie was the showdown in a parking garage. There was a nifty looking long tracking shot that followed Hume as we went from level to level that ended in a decent fight on the roof, inside a car while it rolled slowly towards the edge. As I said, it was a good scene but much like the rest of the movie, it felt misplaced and only there as a vehicle to show us that he could pull it off rather than a smooth transition to an event in the story. The final scene between Hume and Billy was an ending that felt real and it worked well, it was just too little too late. For as bad as this mess was, it was still Wan’s best outing yet as a director. For the record, that’s not a compliment.

This was a textbook paint by numbers film that couldn’t decide if it wanted to be a gritty revenge piece with heart or honest character study with violence. The acting was sub par and the direction was inconsistent. Kevin Bacon deserved much more, and while this was James Wan’s best outing yet, he still isn’t a director I am ready to get on board with. Maybe he should stick to the Saw franchise. Then again, maybe not.

And there’s the rub.

2 1/2 out of 5 stars

Jeremy Welsch

Sunday, September 2, 2007

Movie Review: Halloween (2007) by JW

Title: Halloween
Starring: Malcolm McDowell, Sheri Moon Zombie, Tyler Mane, Scout Taylor-Compton, Brad Dourif, Danielle Harris
Director: Rob Zombie
Producer: Malek Akkad, Patrick Esposito, Andy Gould, Andrew G. La Marca, Matthew Stein, Bob Weinstein, Harvey Weinstein, Rob Zombie
Genre: Horror
Release Date: August 31, 2007
MPAA Rating: R for strong brutal bloody violence and terror throughout, sexual content, graphic nudity and language
Distributors: Dimension Films

This guy’s got some nerve. Rob Zombie has made all of two movies, then up and decides out of thin air he wants to do a remake - of Halloween no less. Who the hell does he think he is anyway? Sure The Devil’s Rejects was great, but Halloween? The grandfather of all slasher movies? Talk about swinging for the fence. This is more than just a horror movie. This is a remake of arguably the greatest slasher flick of all time, the 9th Halloween movie, and a Rob Zombie movie. There were so many prejudged expectations that it never really had a chance, did it?

By now the story of Halloween is the stuff of horror movie lore. In case you are freshly revived from a time capsule: A 10 year old Michael Myers kills his sister and others on Halloween night. He is committed to a mental institution, Smith’s Grove Sanitarium, under the care of Dr. Samuel Loomis. After not speaking for 15 years, Myers breaks free from the hospital and heads back to his childhood home, leaving a trail of bodies in his wake.

Let me just say this - this ain’t your granddaddy’s Halloween. This is Zombie’s take on the classic, and there are differences. In order to justify the remake, there had to be something new enough to interest me. This movie takes chances, and for the most part - they pay off. If you want a shot by shot rehash of something, go watch Van Sant’s pile of swill Psycho remake. That’s not to say it’s not without its flaws, but overall it worked very, very well.

The most glaring difference is the back story. We are made privy to some of Michael Myers’ history previous to his initial batch of Halloween killings. To dig deeper into the back story is to attempt to gain a better understanding of Myers’ motivations. At first, I was mildly offended by Zombie’s presumptions. Why would you go and ruin a good thing by trying to explain why Michael Myers is the way he is? Wasn’t that one of the reasons the original worked - not knowing why? Absolutely, but as the movie unfolded and we were able to see the rest of the chances Zombie took with the picture, everything found its place and it worked. In the end, the back story gives us the necessary information to almost care that he completes his journey. At the very least it added an additional level of tension not present in the original.

Detractors will protest the amount of violence and blood in the film, crying foul because the original worked so well with so little. Huh? Zombie’s first movie was called House of 1000 Corpses. You can’t rack up that many dead bodies without shedding a little blood. That’s like going on a date with Rachel Ray and complaining because she cooked dinner for you.

There are a lot of great performances here that worked too. Sheri Moon-Zombie shows some unforeseen range as Myers’ stripper mother, Deborah. I loved William Forsythe as Deborah’s abusive boyfriend. Tyler Mane makes for a very imposing adult Myers. And Daeg Faerch as young Michael Myers is without a doubt, the creepiest kid I have seen on film in a long time. One down spot for me was the Dr. Loomis character, played by Malcolm McDowell. I appreciated the concept of further intertwining Myers and Dr. Loomis’ story, but this Loomis came off as a bit egotistical whose motivations were more than simply caging the evil of Myers.

All in all, I loved this movie. It worked for me on many levels. As a horror movie, it is tense and conceptually fresh. As a Halloween movie, it is an original yet respectful reinvention. And as a Rob Zombie movie? The script is sharp and inspired, the music is great, and the performances rose above regular horror movie conventions - it is a worthy tribute that Zombie successfully made his own.

And you get to see a ‘monkey’ selling guns.

This movie is Rob Zombie’s Halloween. It is violent, bloody, and fierce. It is audacious in its concept, arrogant in its confidence, and skillful in its execution. I admire the chances he took, and his presumption to think he could pull it off. There is a fine line between introducing original devices to the story and respecting the material of origin. Zombie walks that line to perfection. While not quite as good as The Devil’s Rejects, this is hands down the best Halloween since the original.

And there’s the rub.

http://www.halloween-themovie.com/

4 1/2 out of 5 stars

Jeremy Welsch (jndubbs@gmail.com)